Other Subject -Review the background information. Then, using the References
Review the background information. Then, using the References along with resources from your ownresearch, write a 1-2 page response to the questions that follow. Remember to cite your sources usingproper APA format.Background InformationToday there are many complaints over the politicization of science. Many people believe politics shouldnot play a role in science, but once government funds science, the funding decisions become political.In most social institutions, disagreements are settled by debate. Science in contrast, uses experimentsto prove or disprove theories. Science is testable, and is self-proving. If a better explanation for aphenomenon is found, it will replace other explanations. This is why careful distinctions must be madebetween Frontier Science, Consensus Science, and Junk Science.Many difficult controversies surround the environmental problems we face in the world today. Problemsinclude: Air and water pollution, global warming, species and ecosystem biodiversity, energy,hazardous waste, population, and food supply issues. Politics control the financing of scientific researchand development to help solve these issues. In politics passion wins over logic.Science is not politics and cannot be debated in the same way politics are. Mixing politics with scienceproduces bad science. Government efforts to fund research interfere with the maintenance of highscientific standards. The current Congress consists of 535 members. Of these members, 7 (1.3%), arescientists, and 21 others are healthcare professionals.Use these references along with resources from your own research to help answer the questions thatfollow.Lamb, G. (2005, September 27). Science and politics: a dangerous mix. Christian Science Monitor,97(213), 11-13. Retrieved April 10, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database.Link to articlePielke Jr., R. (2006, Spring2006). When Scientists Politicize Science. Regulation, 29(1), 28-34. RetrievedApril 10, 2009, from Business Source Complete database.Link to articleQuestionsDo you feel that scientists should be cut out of the policy making process, particularly onenvironmental issues, when their research is proven and widely accepted and is being ignored anddisputed? Politicians ultimately make the decisions, but shouldn’t the scientists have a voice?Do you feel that lobbyists and special interest groups exert too great of an influence and act as animpediment to finding solutions to, and providing the funding for, research for the environmentalproblems we face?